User Details
| Username: | GlintEye |
| Website: | None provided |
| Facebook: | None provided |
| Twitter: | None provided |
| Soundcloud: | None provided |
| Account Status: | enabled |
| Member since: | Mar 09 2015 |
| About GlintEye: | |
| (report this profile) |
Devices by GlintEye
No devices have been posted by this user.
Comments by GlintEye
Comments
| The Octave Designer is a really great idea. I'd really like the option to view the roman numerals for the chords. I like to orientate myself around functional harmony and when i can only see the Chord Names with note names i always have to recount which index this chord was relative to the tonic. |
Posted on December 13 2018 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| super cool. thx a lot :) |
Posted on January 23 2018 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| Unfortunately the Device Control 8, 16, 32 Devices don't let me customize the parameters like shown in your Video from 02.00 - 03.10 min. I'm on Max 7 and Live 9.7 Whenever i try to select another Parameter from the list, the selected existing Parameter doesn't change (just "flickers" shortly). Its the same for all three devices. Really to bad. I really liked concept of this thing. Its like a M4L based control surface script. Cheers. |
Posted on January 08 2018 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| SuperCool device. Really was looking for something like that. Sometimes i start out with simple melodic ideas (just a few notes) and want to build it up to the a whole scale write (chord progressions etc). This saves a lot of time figuring out which scales would work and therefore it is easier to make a decision. What i would really like to see too, would be a Chord Detection plugin that works dependent on scale and key and gives you multiple options on the detected Chord: like where a C6 chord could be read as a A7 chord etc. Thx very much for this device. Cheers |
Posted on January 05 2017 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| another great update. would be great if the aux seq, when set to map, would have a smoothing control, to smooth out parameter changes. cheers. |
Posted on December 24 2016 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| Super Cool =). Just got myself a copy Thx very much for this great sequencer. It would be really great if the 4 Macros would have an adjustable glide parameter to get smoother parameter changes when going through the steps. Also if Presets could be chained together would be cool. But either way i'm pretty pleased =). Thx again. |
Posted on December 23 2016 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| very cool. morphing between selected snapshots would be very cool too. |
Posted on March 17 2016 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey. cool device. morphing between 2 chosen presets would be very cool, too. cheers. |
Posted on January 07 2016 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey atomictag. really cool device. it would be really cool, if you could add 2 knobs to control the depth and offset of a mapping of an ableton device parameter. just like the offset and depth knobs in max essentials lfo device. i suggest this because i'd like to use this device to modulate parameters. you could draw in some midi cc automation in a clip which would become your modulation shape and with offset and depth you could control the amount of the modulation and the centerpoint from where it takes place. cheers. marc |
Posted on November 25 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey hyakken, cool. thx for the effort. cheers. marc |
Posted on November 24 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey hyakken, i just bought seq16v3. i really like the sequencer. but there was one thing i would really love to be implemented. i thought when you tie same notes together, that they would become a consecutively longer. for example: the sequencer runs at 1/16 notes per step and i tie 4 consecutive steps of the same note value (lets say C3) so i get a new note which is a 1/4 note long. then the global gate and the gate sequencer would trim this new note length accordingly. i would really love that to be part of the device. cheers. Marc |
Posted on November 21 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey yehezkelraz, just stumbled upon this one. thank you so much. i was looking for some device, with which i can modulate parameters en par with the rhythm in a clip. with normal step sequencers i can't do that. But NOW... :D ...and with velocity sensitivity and glide... aach i'm melting =) thx. i throw a kisshand towards you :x |
Posted on November 10 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| cool. thx very much for the update. cheers. |
Posted on September 23 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| very cool device. thx. any chance there's gonne be a 2.0 update for the audio version of Multimapper32. really love the editable response curves. |
Posted on September 18 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey hyakken, glad to read that there will be an expanded version of of rpe v3 (load time never bothered me as well). also thanks for the implementation of gate time for the seq's. cheers. |
Posted on July 19 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey there, i also miss the polyrhythmic mode :/ and i also dont like, that you just have one sequencer per track. for me this means i would just always leave it on velocity, because it's just to important to trade in. so independent sequencers would be nice. and it would also be nice to have a "gate" sequencer for each track, for varying note lengths. cheers. |
Posted on July 16 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey pmonet, looking forward for v2. it would be cool if there would also be dotted notes in the sync mode. i think now theres just triplets? and a preset mangagement system where you can switch through presets via automation would also be cool. really looking forward for the midi sustained loop feature and the pop up editor window. cheers. |
Posted on May 14 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| thx very much for this update. i really appreciate that. i'm gonna get myself a copy. cheers. |
Posted on April 14 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey hyakken, i haven't bought it yet. wanted to wait for an answer. can you update a picture of the new version showing the new speed options? thx. |
Posted on April 12 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey hyakken. that would be really cool. thank you very much. |
Posted on April 12 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey hyakken. really cool device. just got one question. can you do polymetric patterns here. because it looks like, you can only do polyrhythmic stuff. can you do both, polyrhytmic and polymetric patterns here, like with Rhythm Pattern Editor V2? cheers. marc. |
Posted on April 06 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| oops, you can store presets. just watched the youtube video again and totally forgot about it. sorry. :) |
Posted on March 09 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
| hey bennniii, thx for this great device. some things i would really love to see added. what would be really cool for me, as i'm not that grounded in music theory, would be to have a scale menu where you can choose root key and scale for the note editor page. i think someone else also mentioned it before. and maybe also the option to have a big floating window for note editing. maybe a preset management system to quickly change patterns would also be nice. i like the one from monosequencer which lets you quantize the pattern changes, which is great, if you like to fiddle around with the sequencer live while recording everything into midi or audio. and maybe a smoothing paramater to gradually glide between values for the cc and map sequencers. when i've got some money again, i will send you some bucks :). its definitely worth it thx again. looking forward for your next release :) |
Posted on March 09 2015 by GlintEye (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
why not just stack the choices in lines from bottom row to top row or top to bottom? just not this snail house thing =)
otherwise i appreciate the hard work. its a great device. :)