Device Details
Overview
| Name | Version: | CF Roar Fdbk Note ctrl 1.01 |
| Author: | chapelierfou |
| Device Type: | Audio Effect |
| Description: | Place this device before Roar. It puts Roar automatically in "Note" feedback mode and you can "play" the feedback via MIDI. You can link the velocity to the amount of feedback and either keep the last value or cut it with notes off. Make it scream ! Update : v1.01 amount source (manual/velocity) is properly working if you load Roar when after the device were loaded. |
Details
| Live Version Used: | 10.1.18 |
| Max Version Used: | 8.1.5 |
| Date Added: | Mar 27 2024 15:43:11 |
| Date Last Updated: | Jul 02 2024 16:00:22 |
| Downloads: | 229 |
| ⓘ License: | None |
Average Rating
(1) Log in to rate this device |
4 |
Files
| Device File: | CF_Roar_Fdbk_note_ctrl.amxd |
Comments
cool! thank you!
Posted on March 28 2024 by shinytheshiny |
Report Issue
trop cool :) merci
Posted on March 28 2024 by maximedangles |
Report Issue
Nice device! Thanks. Nevertheless I have a feature request: could you make the device independent from the midi track? So I can drop CF Roar Fdbk Note ctrl 1.0 on another midi track. Similar to this device for resonator https://www.maxforlive.com/library/device/3084/bcresonctrl1-0
Posted on March 28 2024 by distantnoise |
Report Issue
@distantnoise :
Same inspiration indeed !
In the end it's the same, it still needs 2 tracks...Well to be precise, in this regard, the method I use is more practical as you can select a MIDI controller directly as a source without any MIDI track.
Also, the "place before Roar" method is more robust (I don't trust choosers with sub menus that rely on track that might be deleted, moved, renamed or whatever).
Am I missing something ? Why would the other method be better ?
Same inspiration indeed !
In the end it's the same, it still needs 2 tracks...Well to be precise, in this regard, the method I use is more practical as you can select a MIDI controller directly as a source without any MIDI track.
Also, the "place before Roar" method is more robust (I don't trust choosers with sub menus that rely on track that might be deleted, moved, renamed or whatever).
Am I missing something ? Why would the other method be better ?
Posted on March 28 2024 by chapelierfou |
Report Issue
@chapelierfou: you are right, my mistake. There would be no real advantage. However, could you make a toggle to turn on/off "Midi-Note-Message" so only velocity is send? So one can control the feedback amount without changing the note. Thanks
Posted on March 29 2024 by distantnoise |
Report Issue
@distantnoise, then use Expression Control and don't bother using my device.
Posted on March 29 2024 by chapelierfou |
Report Issue
Login to comment on this device.
Browse the full library