User Details
Username: | feefs |
Website: | www.instagram.com/sirismyfirstname/ |
Facebook: | None provided |
Twitter: | None provided |
Soundcloud: | None provided |
Account Status: | enabled |
Member since: | Oct 21 2019 |
About feefs: | |
(report this profile) |
Devices by feefs
No devices have been posted by this user.
Comments by feefs
Comments
Nice! was in the middle of building this exact thing when I came across your device for midi, which led me here. Good work! |
Posted on June 04 2020 by feefs (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
Brilliant. |
Posted on February 12 2020 by feefs (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
Excellent work! |
Posted on October 21 2019 by feefs (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
Simple. Elegant. Great Job! |
Posted on October 21 2019 by feefs (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
Excellent. This is exactly what I needed. Looking forward to sharing the results. |
Posted on October 21 2019 by feefs (report comment) (Goto Comment) |
First off this is an awesome device.
I have an idea for a small edit to your patch.
Basically Im using two of them to fade between racks of m4l FX. I do this by putting two racks full of FX inside of another rack and putting fades on the chain selector regions. I put one of your devices before each of the FX racks full of devices. Essentially a rack of racks. The problem I have is that your device wont properly refresh wile inside of another rack (which makes sense). My current solution is to pull your device out of the rack, (along with its corresponding FX rack) refresh it (so it links to the clip slots to the FX rack) and put it back into the rack (rack of racks). I hope that's not to confusing.
While I can make it work to fit my needs, I'm wondering how hard it would be to update the device so that you could refresh it wile INSIDE of another rack...
Thank you for taking the time to read this. Please let me know if I can better explain myself.